Budnick v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

We affirm the final judgment because we find that the appellant’s general objec*939tion to bifurcation was not sufficient to preserve the perceived error that certain evidence should be allowed into evidence during Phase I of the proceedings. See Noel v. Broward Gen. Med. Ctr., 725 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Corona v. State, 64 So.3d 1232 (Fla. 2011); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332 (Fla. 1982); Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493 (Fla. 1992).

Affirmed.