Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2012

Budnick v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

Budnick v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 5, 2012 · Bonavita, Polen, Stevenson
101 So. 3d 938; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20891; 2012 WL 6027807 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Budnick v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.

Opinion of the Court

POLEN, J.

We affirm the final judgment because we find that the appellant’s general objec*939tion to bifurcation was not sufficient to preserve the perceived error that certain evidence should be allowed into evidence during Phase I of the proceedings. See Noel v. Broward Gen. Med. Ctr., 725 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Corona v. State, 64 So.3d 1232 (Fla. 2011); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332 (Fla. 1982); Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493 (Fla. 1992).

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, J., and BONAVITA, AUGUST, Associate Judge, concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑