Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s dismissal of appellant’s untimely and successive motion for postconviction relief. The motion attempted to raise the procedurally barred claim that appellant was incompetent during his trial, which occurred in 2000. See Thompson v. State, 88 So.3d 312, 316 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (citing Nelson v. State, 43 So.3d 20, 33 (Fla. 2010)). Appellant has filed numerous postconviction challenges and appeals. Appellant was recently cautioned against frivolous filing in case num
Affirmed; appellant cautioned against frivolous filing.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.