Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2012

Cordoves v. Cordoves

Cordoves v. Cordoves
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 26, 2012 · Cortiñas, Fernandez, Logue
105 So. 3d 591; 2012 WL 6682017; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 21987 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cordoves v. Cordoves

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979)(“When there are issues of fact the appellant necessarily asks the reviewing court to draw conclusions about the evidence. Without a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court cannot properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.”); see also Fla. R.App. P. 9.200(b)(4) (2012) (providing a method for preparing a statement of the evidence and proceedings when a transcript is unavailable).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.