Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2012

Romo-Jimenez v. State

Romo-Jimenez v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 18, 2012 · Cohen, Jacobus, Sawaya
114 So. 3d 978; 2012 WL 1752996; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7983 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Romo-Jimenez v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Juan Javier Romo-Jimenez challenges the denial of his motion to suppress recordings obtained following the approval of a wiretap and the trial court’s sua sponte restriction of the cross-examination of a co-defendant. In addition, Romo-Jimenez raises a Shelton1 issue. Finding no error, we affirm. See Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). We certify that the same issue reviewed in this case is currently pending before the Florida Supreme Court in State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla. 2011). The mandate will be withheld pending final disposition in Adkins.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, COHEN and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

. Shelton v. Sec., Dep't of Corr., 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla. 2011).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.