Castillo v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
Cases that cite this one
3 later published cases cite this decision.
- Citibank, N.A. v. Olsak (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
- DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, etc. v. CHRISTOPHER HARRIS a/k/a CHRISTOPHER E. HARRIS (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- HSBC Bank USA v. Buset (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The appellant in this case challenges the appellee’s standing to bring a foreclosure action against the appellant, arguing the appellee, a common-law trust, failed to comply with its pooling and servicing agreement when it took possession of the original note and mortgage and thus the trust cannot legally be in possession of the note and mortgage when it was obtained in violation of its trust documents. Because the appellant is neither a party to nor a third-party beneficiary of the trust, we find the appellant lacks standing to raise this issue and affirm the final judgment of foreclosure in favor of the appellee, as the holder of the original note and mortgage. See In re Walker, 466 B.R. 271, 280-81
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.