Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2012

Roche v. State

Roche v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 20, 2012 · Emas, Fernandez, Wells
89 So. 3d 1142; 2012 WL 2327775; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9851 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Roche v. State

Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Chief Judge.

Affirmed. See Smith v. State, 79 So.3d 127 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012); Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Adams v. State, 76 So.3d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional); see also Flagg v. State, 74 So.3d 138, 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (citing State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011) [review granted, 71 So.3d 117 (Fla. 2011) ], and acknowledging β€œthe uncertainty caused by Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289 (M.D.Fla. 2011)]” but reaffirming its view that section 893.13 is constitutional).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.