Jarvis v. State
Jarvis v. State
92 So. 3d 287; 2012 WL 2864386; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11395
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Jarvis v. State
Opinion of the Court
Naim Jarvis (defendant) appeals his judgment and sentence, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirm. However, we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error. The judgment incorrectly states that the defendant pled nolo contendere to a third-degree felony when he actually pled to a first-degree misdemeanor.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.