Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2012

Shaw v. State

Shaw v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 25, 2012 · Hazouri, Polen, Stevenson
93 So. 3d 1120; 2012 WL 3023166; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 12117 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Shaw v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 motion. The motion was untimely. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. Further, appellant’s claim is without merit. Maestas v. State, 76 So.3d 991 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011).

Affirmed.

POLEN, STEVENSON and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.