Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2012

Dimonda v. State

Dimonda v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 30, 2012 · Ciklin, Damoorgian, Stevenson
93 So. 3d 361; 2012 WL 1934481; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8740 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Dimonda v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence. Without passing on the merits of appellant’s claim that he did not knowingly or voluntarily enter a plea, the denial is without prejudice to his right to file a rule 3.850 motion in the trial court, should that be appropriate, within thirty (30) days of this opinion. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, DAMOORGIAN and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.