Sharp v. Barreto
Sharp v. Barreto
95 So. 3d 321; 2012 WL 2913172; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11526
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Sharp v. Barreto
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See In re Estate of Paris, 699 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) (Stockman requirement is inapplicable to attorney’s fee claims in probate proceeding); Levine v. Keaster, 862 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (appellant must identify the particular allegedly erroneous items of challenged attorney’s fees award).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.