Mancine v. State
Mancine v. State
95 So. 3d 412; 2012 WL 3192734; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13191
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Mancine v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence, in which he challenges the Department of Corrections’ application of his court-ordered jail credit. Defendant should first exhaust his administrative remedies through the Department of Corrections. See Ward v. State, 974 So.2d 542 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008). If he is not satisfied with the Department’s ruling, he can then file a petition for writ of mandamus with the appropriate court. See Robinson v. State, 818 So.2d 543 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.