Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2012

Sheikh v. Mughal

Sheikh v. Mughal
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 24, 2012 · Evander, Lawson, Sawaya
95 So. 3d 469; 2012 WL 3627505; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14160 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Sheikh v. Mughal

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Jamil Sheikh appeals from an order of civil contempt, making numerous arguments based upon matters not included in the record. Without a record, and because there is no error apparent on the face of the order itself, we affirm. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that a trial court’s order is presumed correct and that where appellant does not provide a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court has no basis to conclude that the trial court’s judgment is not supported by the evidence). See also Poling v. Palm Coast Abstract & Title, Inc., 882 So.2d 483, 485 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, LAWSON and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.