Hayes v. State
Hayes v. State
96 So. 3d 1047; 2012 WL 3711490; 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14499
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Hayes v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the denial of the defendant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. His claim that the two robbery offenses, to which he pleaded, could not be scored separately on his scoresheet is without merit on its face. The scoring of these separate convictions, even if they did arise from the same criminal episode, is not erroneous and does not violate double jeopardy. § 775.021, Fla. Stat. (2011).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.