Cifuentes v. State
Cifuentes v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the summary denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief, which challenged his 1996 no contest plea to charges of resisting with violence and battery. His claims are procedurally
Further, even if Padilla is found to be retroactive, appellant does not allege that the court failed to give the standard deportation warning of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c)(8), and his claim is insufficient to merit relief. See Flores v. State, 57 So.3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010), petition for review pending, No. SC11-989.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.