Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2013

Hudson v. State

Hudson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 16, 2013 · Lagoa, Salter, Suarez
105 So. 3d 621; 2013 WL 163466; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 527 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Hudson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See, e.g., Barnard v. State, 949 So.2d 250, 251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (“Habeas corpus may not be used to file successive 3.850 motions or to raise issues which would be untimely if considered as a motion for postconviction relief under rule 3.850.” (citing Baker v. State, 878 So.2d

*6221236, 1245-46 (Fla. 2004))); see also Hernandez v. State, — So.3d-(Fla. 2012).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑