Southeast Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena
Southeast Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena
106 So. 3d 1009; 2013 WL 615338; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2604
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Southeast Fish & Seafood Co. v. Cadena
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. See, e.g., Pariz v. Colon, 77 So.3d 721, 722 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that a trial court had in rem jurisdiction over property situated within the county); Griveas v. Amoco Oil Co., 854 So.2d 841, 843 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003) (“Only the circuit court in the county where the real property is located has in rem jurisdiction.”).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.