Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2013

Vasquez v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 13, 2013 · Ciklin, Damoorgian, Levine

107 So. 3d 493; 2013 WL 513245; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2255; 38 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 356 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Vasquez v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We summarily affirm the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to vacate the Order of Restitution. Fla. R.App. P. 9.315(a). Appellant failed to provide any support for her allegation that the restitution in this case was satisfied through a sale of property on which the victim had a lien. Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant again seeking relief from the trial court if she can provide adequate support for her allegation that the restitution in this case has been satisfied.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.