Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
109 So. 3d 277; 2013 WL 709774; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3219
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Opinion of the Court
We conclude that we have jurisdiction. As the state properly concedes, the appellant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the merits of his motions for return of property. We therefore reverse and remand for a hearing.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.