Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2013

Warfield v. State

Warfield v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 3, 2013 · Benton, Swanson, Wolf
109 So. 3d 895; 2013 WL 1317005; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5438 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Warfield v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See State v. Brunson, 369 So.2d 945, 947 (Fla. 1979) (“We specifically hold that a felon under eighteen years of age who is sentenced to probation, but who subsequently violates that probation in a manner which justifies its revocation, may be sentenced without benefit of a presentence investigation. We further hold that once a juvenile felon has demonstrated his inability to comply with the conditions of his probation and has consequently had it revoked, a presentence investigation is not required before sentencing on any subsequent felonies he may commit.”).

BENTON, C.J., WOLF, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.