Dixon v. State
Dixon v. State
110 So. 3d 915; 2013 WL 363717; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1435
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Dixon v. State
Opinion of the Court
Because appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus was not filed in the sentencing court, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to address it. See, e.g., Epps v. McNeil, 37 So.3d 923, 923 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Zuluaga v. State, Dep’t of Corrs., 32 So.3d 674, 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010). We affirm the trial court’s denial of the petition on that basis, without prejudice to appellant’s
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.