Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2013

Richardson v. State

Richardson v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 22, 2013 · Benton, Marstiller, Rowe
111 So. 3d 303; 2013 WL 1715453; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6493 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Richardson v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Because petitioner has failed to show that he has brought the pending motion to the attention to the trial court or made an express and distinct demand for performance, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Thomas v. State, Dep’t of Revenue, 74 So.3d 145 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011); Al-Hakim v. State, 783 So.2d 293 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

BENTON, C.J., ROWE and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.