Houston v. State
Houston v. State
113 So. 3d 1026; 2013 WL 2234013; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8187
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Houston v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences without discussion. Any failure in the written probation revocation order to specify the conditions of probation that were violated cannot be raised for the first time on appeal. However, we agree the trial court erred in denying appellant’s rule 8.800(b)(2) motion to correct the written judgment and sentence to reflect that appellant entered a nolo contendere plea to the offense charged in circuit court case number 2009-CF-814. Accordingly, we remand with directions that the trial court enter a corrected judgment and sentence.
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.