HRGS, Inc. v. Goodwin
HRGS, Inc. v. Goodwin
113 So. 3d 1035; 2013 WL 2359489; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8581
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
HRGS, Inc. v. Goodwin
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s denial of an award of attorney’s fees to Appellants as we find no abuse of the court’s discretion. See T &W Developers, Inc. v. Salmonsen, 31 So.3d 298, 301 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010). However, we reverse the trial court’s order denying Appellants an award of costs. See Wolfe v. Culpepper Constructors, Inc., 104 So.3d 1132, 1137 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012); Granoff v. Seidle, 915 So.2d 674, 677 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005). On remand, the trial court shall award Appellants their reasonable, taxable costs.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.