Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2013

Pamphile v. State

Pamphile v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 8, 2013 · Berger, Orfinger, Palmer
113 So. 3d 949; 2013 WL 461634; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 1937 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Pamphile v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

See Williams v. State, 768 So.2d 1281, 1281 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (“Given the overwhelming evidence of guilt adduced by the state, we cannot find that the denial of the *950appellant’s motion for a continuance during trial, in order to locate a defense witness, caused any material prejudice to the appellant particularly when it is unknown whether the witnesses’ testimony would have been favorable to the appellant.”).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., PALMER and BERGER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑