Moore v. State
Moore v. State
114 So. 3d 291; 2013 WL 1748561; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 6566
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Moore v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s untimely motion for postconviction relief which attempted to challenge his 1996 conviction. Lafler v. Cooper, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012), and Missouri v. Frye, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012), did not create any new fundamental constitutional right, and these decisions do not provide any exception to the time limitation for seeking postconviction relief. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b)(2); Simmons v. State, 104 So.3d 1185 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.