Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2013

Tillett v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

Tillett v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided July 5, 2013 · Lewis, Roberts, Rowe
115 So. 3d 1119; 2013 WL 3359179; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 10826 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Tillett v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed -with the appropriate court within 30 days of rendition of the order on appeal. Fla. R.App. P. 9.110(b). Merely mailing the notice or having the notice placed in a post office box within the required time period is not sufficient. Raysor v. Raysor, 706 So.2d 400, 401 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Although appellant alleges he mailed the *1120notice of appeal within the appropriate time, it was not received by the Court until May 6, 2013, and was therefore not filed in a timely manner. Further, the filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional. Florida courts are required to dismiss an appeal if the notice is not filed within the applicable time limit. See Miami-Dade County v. Peart, 843 So.2d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

LEWIS, C.J., ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.