Tate v. State
Tate v. State
121 So. 3d 1156; 2013 WL 5222076; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 14823
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s April 10, 2013 Motion for Discharge. The motion was an untimely request for postconviction relief and no valid exception to the time limitation is alleged in the motion. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b).
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.