Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2013

State v. D.H.

State v. D.H.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 13, 2013 · Ciklin, Stevenson, Warner
123 So. 3d 1175; 2013 WL 949879; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3962 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)
State v. D.H.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

An order granting a defendant’s pretrial motion in limine is not appealable under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, but the order is reviewable by common-law certiorari. See State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla. 1988); State v. Sealy Doe, 861 So.2d 530 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). We therefore treat the state’s appeal of the order granting the motion in limine as a petition for writ of certiorari. The petition is denied.

Denied.

WARNER, STEVENSON and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.