King v. State
King v. State
123 So. 3d 661; 2013 WL 5628672; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 16400
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
King v. State
Opinion of the Court
We reverse the denial of appellant’s Rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. The sentencing documents reflect that the court imposed thirty-year sentences for unarmed robbery counts, which exceed the fifteen-year statutory maximum for a second degree felony. The sentencing order does not designate appellant as a habitual offender. The state concedes that the sentences require correction, as they exceed that statutory maximum. We remand for the trial court to correct these sentences for strong arm robbery in Case Nos. 01-4344, 01-3524, 01-3092, and 01-3089.
Reversed and remanded to correct sentence.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.