Pray v. State
Pray v. State
125 So. 3d 229; 2013 WL 611264; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2789
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Pray v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence. Appellant has previously challenged his 10-20-life sentence for attempted robbery with a firearm. Appellant has not shown that any manifest injustice results from refusing to reconsider this claim where he is serving a concurrent sentence of the same length on count I and the sentence for count I is legal. State v. McBride, 848 So.2d 287, 292 (Fla. 2003).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.