Rocha v. State
Rocha v. State
125 So. 3d 230; 2013 WL 611332; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2797
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Rocha v. State
Opinion of the Court
Juan Alberto Rocha appeals the denial of his Rule 3.800 motion and motion for rehearing, which sought more jail credit than that awarded pursuant to his plea agreement. We affirm. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla. 2011) (holding that challenges to plea agreement provisions regarding credit for time served are not cognizable under the rule providing a mechanism for correcting the improper denial of credit for time served, because those challenges present factual questions that cannot be resolved on the basis of the court records).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.