Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2013

Rocha v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 20, 2013 · Conner, Damoorgian, Taylor

125 So. 3d 230; 2013 WL 611332; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2797 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Amador v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Juan Alberto Rocha appeals the denial of his Rule 3.800 motion and motion for rehearing, which sought more jail credit than that awarded pursuant to his plea agreement. We affirm. See Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla. 2011) (holding that challenges to plea agreement provisions regarding credit for time served are not cognizable under the rule providing a mechanism for correcting the improper denial of credit for time served, because those challenges present factual questions that cannot be resolved on the basis of the court records).

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.