East v. State
East v. State
126 So. 3d 1243; 2013 WL 6031619; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18155
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
East v. State
Opinion of the Court
We find no error in either issue raised on appeal. The State properly has brought to our attention, however, that Appellant was erroneously adjudicated guilty of both burglary with a battery and a simple battery based on the same conduct. The court did not score or sentence Appellant on the battery; however, it erroneously appears on the judgment. We remand for the trial court to strike it from the judgment.
AFFIRMED; and REMANDED to correct judgment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.