Marshall v. State
Marshall v. State
127 So. 3d 720; 2013 WL 6122227; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18571
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Marshall v. State
Opinion of the Court
After a review of the presentence investigation report, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing drug and alcohol treatment related requirements as special conditions of probation. See Biller v. State, 618 So.2d 734 (Fla. 1993); Austin v. State, 67 So.3d 403, 406-07 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.