Santiago v. State
Santiago v. State
128 So. 3d 942; 2013 WL 6821481; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20374
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Santiago v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant argues that the trial court erred in reducing his jail credit for time served after the original sentencing hearing. The State concedes that the trial court erred. See Davis v. State, 63 So.3d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (“[Jjail credit cannot be rescinded after it has been awarded, even if the credit was awarded in error.”). Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for entry of a judgment and sentence reflecting the original award of jail credit for time served.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.