McDonald v. State
McDonald v. State
133 So. 3d 530; 2013 WL 5927737; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17645
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
McDonald v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the postconviction court’s order summarily denying Kenneth McDonald’s postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 because McDonald’s motion was without merit, untimely, and successive. We caution McDonald and others that the holding in Deras v. State, 54 So.3d 1023 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), is limited to its facts and does not, in our view, create a manifest injustice exception to the rule 3.850 time bar.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.