McDonald v. State
Cases that cite this one
130 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- JAMES JASON RIANI v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
- RICHARD W. MC CARTHY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
- LAVAREN GRADY v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
- JOHN D. WALKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
- HERMAN A. WALLACE v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
- DEXTER BELL v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
- BEN HAYES v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
- TYRONE ROGERS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
- JOSIE BEDFORD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
- THOMAS LESHER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
- MARK JONES v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
- MATTHEW ERIC REID v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- JAMES WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- BRUCE EDWARD DUKES v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- SERVANDO GREGORIO v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- EDWARD R. NIELSEN v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- DAVID I. EPPS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- CHRISTOPHER LEHNING v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- CHARLES RAY GORDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- RYAN WILLIAM COVEMAKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- MANUEL MENDEZ-HERNANDEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- CALVIN EVERETT v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- ROBERT JOHN SAGER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- RALPH MARK SEILER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
- CHRISTOPHER J. RAHAIM v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
We affirm the postconviction court’s order summarily denying Kenneth McDonald’s postconviction motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 because McDonald’s motion was without merit, untimely, and successive. We caution McDonald and others that the holding in Deras v. State, 54 So.3d 1023 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), is limited to its facts and does not, in our view, create a manifest injustice exception to the rule 3.850 time bar.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.