Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2013

Frank v. Comerica Bank

Frank v. Comerica Bank
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided August 7, 2013 · Ciklin, Conner, Damoorgian
134 So. 3d 1050; 2013 WL 4006981; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12347 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Frank v. Comerica Bank

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion the trial court’s denial of Frank’s motion to quash service. We dismiss the remainder of Frank’s appeal. An order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of standing is not listed as an appealable non-final order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to review *1051the trial court’s order in regard to standing. Morton & Oxley, Ltd. v. Charles S. Eby, M.D., P.A., 916 So.2d 820, 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Supal v. Pelot, 469 So.2d 949, 950 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.