Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2013

Strickland v. State

Strickland v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 20, 2013 · Makar, Roberts, Wolf
135 So. 3d 348; 2013 WL 6097539; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18511 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Strickland v. State

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This Anders1 appeal arises from a judgment and sentence for possession of a *349firearm by a convicted felon pursuant to section 790.28, Florida Statutes (2008). We affirm the judgment and sentence, but remand with instructions to correct two scrivener’s errors on’ the trial court’s cost and fines worksheet. The first appears in a fee listed and assessed on the worksheet that cites a non-existent statute, section 938.93, Florida Statutes, which should be changed to “section 938.03, Florida Statutes.” The second appears in the last fee listed and assessed on the worksheet that cites a non-existent statute, section 938.185, Florida Statutes, which should be changed to “section 939.185, Florida Statutes.”

WOLF, ROBERTS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.