Dunklin v. State
Dunklin v. State
135 So. 3d 349; 2013 WL 6097543; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 18526
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Dunklin v. State
Opinion of the Court
This direct criminal appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Finding no reversible error, we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the judgment and sentence. However, because the record provides no indication that the trial court entered a written order of revocation of probation, we remand for the trial court to enter such an order. See Pressley v. State, 903 So.2d 1053 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Hallman v. State, 845 So.2d 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003).
AFFIRMED and REMANDED with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.