Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2013

Srzedzinski v. Burgess

Srzedzinski v. Burgess
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided December 27, 2013 · Berger, Orfinger, Wallis
135 So. 3d 360; 2013 WL 6816688; 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20386 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Srzedzinski v. Burgess

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The former husband, Joseph M. Srzed-zinski, appeals the final judgment dissolving his marriage to the former wife, Latisha Burgess, asserting numerous errors. We affirm in all respects except as to one issue relating to the parenting plan. The final judgment denied the former wife’s request to relocate with the child from Seminole County to Hillsborough County, and provided that the former wife’s address would be used for school boundary determination and registration. However, the parenting plan reflects the former wife’s Hillsborough County address. On remand, the trial court shall require the parties’ child to be returned to Seminole County. Should the former wife fail to return with the child, the trial court shall reconsider the time sharing arrangement and the address utilized for school purposes.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.