Royster v. State
Royster v. State
Opinion
Davone Lamar Royster appeals his judgments for first-degree murder, attempted armed robbery with a firearm or deadly weapon, and attempted first-degree murder. He also appeals his life sentence with the possibility of parole on the first-degree murder conviction. He first argues that the trial court erred by refusing to require the State to provide immunity to a State witness or to suffer a judgment of acquittal. We affirm that issue without further comment. We also affirm on the second issue, regarding the legality of his life sentence with the possibility of parole, which is controlled by our recent opinion in Rodriguez-Giudicelli v. State, 143 So.3d 947 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014).
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.