We agree with appellant that a rule 3.800(b) motion is an appropriate means for asserting an unpreserved procedural error in the sentencing process relating to whether appellant was properly habitual-ized by the court. Jackson v. State, 983 So.2d 562, 572 (Fla. 2008) (citing Brannon v. State, 850 So.2d 452, 454 (Fla. 2003)). Defendants may raise such constitutional challenges to a sentence in a rule 3.800(b) motion. Miller v. State, 788 So.2d 330, 331 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). However, we affirm on all other issues raised by appellant on the merits.

Affirmed.