Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2014

Mubarak Qureshi v. State

Mubarak Qureshi v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 19, 2014 · Gross, Taylor, Gerber
152 So. 3d 680; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 18839; 2014 WL 6460790 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Mubarak Qureshi v. State

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

At the violation of probation hearing in this case, the trial judge found that appellant violated his probation by committing new substantive offenses. However, the written order of revocation of probation, which issued several days later, indicated that the basis for revocation was a failure to pay restitution, in addition to the commission of a new criminal offense.

Appellant did not file a motion to correct a sentencing error under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b). See Jackson v. State, 983 So.2d 562, 572 (Fla. 2008); Rivera v. State, 34 So.3d 207, 208 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010). By failing to file a Rule 3.800(b) motion, appellant waived this issue and cannot raise it on appeal. See Reese v. State, 763 So.2d 537, 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

GROSS, TAYLOR and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.