Smith v. State
Smith v. State
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 31, 2014.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________ No. 3D14-2643 Lower Tribunal No. 92-2775 ________________
Mark Smith, Petitioner, vs. The State of Florida, Respondent.
A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Mandamus.
Mark Smith, in proper person.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for respondent.
Before WELLS, SUAREZ, and ROTHENBERG PER CURIAM.
The defendant has filed a petition for writ of mandamus attempting to, once again, obtain a resentencing on counts I and II. This is his fourth attempt to obtain such a resentencing. In 2008, this Court rejected a similar argument saying “the same issue has been raised in a previous motion and been ruled upon and denied.
See Smith v. State, 669 So. 2d 1133 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996).” We therefore deny this petition for a writ of mandamus. We caution the defendant that further attempts to obtain such relief may subject the defendant to sanctions.
Petition denied.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.