Thomas v. State
Thomas v. State
133 So. 3d 556; 2014 WL 464067; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1394
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Thomas v. State
Opinion of the Court
The order striking Joseph Lee Thomas’s motion to compel the return of property is affirmed without prejudice for Thomas to file an authorized motion. Should Thomas choose to file such a motion, the circuit court shall entertain Thomas’s motion pursuant to the procedure outlined in Bolden v. State, 875 So.2d 780, 782-83 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).
Affirmed without prejudice.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.