Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2014

De Cosmo v. Forst

De Cosmo v. Forst
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided April 22, 2014 · Lewis, Makar, Padovano
135 So. 3d 1163; 2014 WL 1612694; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 5740 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

De Cosmo v. Forst

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner has not demonstrated that the trial court has failed to timely consider and rule upon any pending pleading or motion after having that matter called up for hearing and disposition. Petitioner has therefore failed to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. See Smartt v. First Union Nat Bank, 771 So.2d 1232 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). We DENY the petition accordingly.

LEWIS, C.J., PADOVANO and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.