Geil v. State
Geil v. State
Opinion of the Court
The appellant appeals an order denying his motion seeking jail credit. Because the appellant’s motion was filed after July 1, 2013, it should be treated as though filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. The appellant’s motion is facially insufficient pursuant to that rule as he fails to allege any of the required information. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.801(c). Pursuant to the new rule the appellant is entitled to an opportunity to amend to
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.