Santiago v. State
Santiago v. State
149 So. 3d 743; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 17749; 2014 WL 5478128
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Santiago v. State
Opinion of the Court
We affirm on all issues, but remand for correction of two scrivener’s errors. As part of a negotiated plea agreement, Defendant entered a nolo contendere plea to possession of cocaine, a lesser-included offense of the charged crime of possession of cocaine with intent to sell or deliver. Unfortunately, the Judgment and the corrected Order of Disposition both erroneously recite that Defendant was adjudicated guilty of the charged offense. We must,
AFFIRMED; REMANDED with instructions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.