Chunn v. State
Chunn v. State
161 So. 3d 415; 2014 WL 656650; 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 2513
(Southern Reporter, Third Series)
Chunn v. State
Opinion of the Court
Kyle Lee Chunn appeals from findings that he violated his probation in multiple ways (including serious new law violations), arguing that no condition one violation was proven or found, and that we should vacate the life sentence and remand for resentencing. The State properly concedes that the judgment needs to be corrected to reflect that the trial court did not find a condition one violation. No other relief is warranted, however, and we affirm in all other respects.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF JUDGMENT.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.