Florida District Courts of Appeal, 2015

Anthony Dorsett v. State of Florida

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 3, 2015 · Gerber, Levine, Klingensmith

166 So. 3d 898; 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 8468; 2015 WL 3488181 (Southern Reporter, Third Series)

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

DERRICK J. ANDERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
ERIC DAMON GORDON v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Anderson v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Anderson v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Gordon v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Gordon v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
SAMUEL NORWOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
STEVEN R. PHELPS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Norwood v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Sheffield v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion. Johnson v. State, 60 So.3d 1045 (Fla. 2011); Casteel v. State, 141 So.3d 624 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014). “[R]eview of the record establishes that the defendant did not satisfy the burden of showing entitlement to relief on the face of the record.” Johnson, 60 So.3d at 1051 n. 2. Appellant’s second claim is meritless as the alleged disproportionality between his sentence, and the sentence of his co-defendant, does not establish an “illegal sentence” cognizable under rule 3.800(a). Shivers v. State, 96 So.3d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Affirmed.

GERBER, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.