The defendant argues that the circuit court erred in issuing an order barring him from proceeding pro se in future post-conviction motions. The court found that the defendant filed successive and frivolous motions. However, the defendant argues he filed only one rule 3.850 motion. The state appropriately concedes that the record supports the defendant’s argument. Based on the foregoing, we reverse the *1070 order and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Reversed and remanded.